crosstype relations ▸ iee ▸ lii
IEE ⟵ LII

IEE and LII: supervision (LII supervises IEE)

IEE and LII are not on level ground: LII leads with the element IEE is weakest at, and presses on it without effort or intent. Supervision has a direction, so LII and IEE live in the same relation differently — one feels watched, the other feels interested. The compatibility is asymmetric.

The watched feeling. LII leads with the thing IEE is weakest at — and presses on it constantly, without effort and without meaning to. This relation has a direction.

notation:
LII ⟶ SUPERVISES ⟶ IEE

§1 Supervision (supervisor / supervisee) — how the stacks collide

elementin IEEin LIIwhat happens
Nebase (1)creative (2)IEE lives here; LII visits, skillfully
Ficreative (2)role (3)IEE's craft is LII's obligation
Serole (3)vulnerable (4)IEE's chore lands on LII's bruise
Tivulnerable (4)base (1)LII leads with IEE's sore spot — pressure from above
Sisuggestive (5)mobilizing (6)both want it; neither has it
Temobilizing (6)ignoring (7)LII has it and won't perform it; IEE wanted the performance
Niignoring (7)demonstrative (8)strong meets strong; neither shows it off
Fedemonstrative (8)suggestive (5)IEE covers it in passing; LII feeds quietly

slots, in one line: base & creative = native strengths · role = performed on demand · vulnerable = the sore spot · suggestive & mobilizing = what's wanted from others · ignoring & demonstrative = strong but not valued.

§2 In practice

Where it clicks

  1. The conversation is the good part. The IEE's base Ne brings what people could become; the LII's creative Ne brings what principles could become. One walk yields six plans neither will ever execute, to everyone's satisfaction.
  2. Every so often the LII converts one of the IEE's enthusiasms into a two-column comparison, and every so often the IEE actually uses it. The retraining decision that stuck came out of exactly this machinery.
  3. Before dinners, the IEE's creative Fi briefs the LII on who's feuding with whom. Working from the briefing, the LII's role Fi can perform an adequate evening, and the LII knows it.
  4. They rest the same way, the LII mobilizing Si and the IEE receiving it in the suggestive slot: unforced evenings, no obligatory outings. Tea and two separate books still counts as spending the evening together.
  5. Nobody pushes anybody in this pair. No raised voices, no on-the-spot demands for compliance, no power plays. Disagreement stays verbal and abstract, the only register both of them find safe.

Where it grinds

  1. Define what you mean by soon, says the LII's base Ti in the middle of scheduling. The IEE answers with a story about a person. The LII follows up with a taxonomy. Both walk away from the exchange hungry.
  2. The LII grades the very feature the IEE leads with. That's four ideas and none of them finished, says the creative Ne watching the base Ne. The IEE hears their own engine described as a defect.
  3. When the IEE talks about who feels what about whom, the LII's role Fi delivers a brief, correct performance, then a generalization. To the IEE, the generalization is just coldness with good posture.
  4. The chore chart survives about nine days. The LII wants one consistent system; the IEE renegotiates it per case, per person, per mood. So the LII rebuilds the chart, and the IEE decorates it.
  5. The closer they get, the more of the IEE's talk ends up in the LII's files. Eventually the IEE starts editing themselves before speaking — the one thing an IEE was never built to do.

§3 IEE with everyone