SAMPLE RESULT — this is what the free tier delivers. The card is the shareable unit.
The models split on you over six answers about deadlines and moods. →
crosstype.appReading the card: IEI / EII = type codes · Ni-Fe = the type's two strongest functions · β beta / δ delta = its quadra, one of four families of four types. The bars are the Model A engine's top three calls; the squares mark each model's verdict.
Two models read your answers and did not agree. MODEL A weighs your pattern of long-range imagery and emotional timing and lands on IEI. MODEL G runs the same answers through Gulenko's energy criteria and leans EII — it takes your steadiness about people at face value, where Model A reads it as mood-management.
A 37-point gap sounds decisive. It isn't: six answers are doing most of the work. A margin is a hypothesis, not a diagnosis.
The type whose strengths sit exactly under your weak spots — in theory. Read what that claim actually is.
/relations/iei/sle →The person whose competence exhausts you, and vice versa — usually discovered two months in.
/relations/iei/lse →The one whose native language is your sore spot. Supervision has a direction; you're on the receiving end.
/relations/lie/iei →You've seen what. The report is why.
The full report runs the same procedure for all eight functions — and settles the IEI/EII question, or tells you plainly that it can't.
Scored in your browser. No tracking. The marking scheme is public at /method.